Clitoris and male equivalent

Actually controlling libido was explicitly the reason that male circumcision became so common in the english speaking world during the victorian era. However, my question is: Also, no one is saying that it would be more OK for one sex or another to have a mutilation performed on them, by virtue of them being male and female. In places were FGM is performed, it is probably more harmful than MGM, as the procedure in FGM is often more invasive. They also contain erectile tissue. So while I would welcome this response if it was a reply to a post that says what you imply, standing on its own I do not think it corresponds to either the rules of this subreddit nor its intents. This article needs additional citations for verification.

It is not up to a doctor to declare that male circumcision is small enough not to matter. Highlights of this one include:. Or that of another man?